CASE STUDYCase Study: Successful Pre-Charge Representations in £4,350 Theft Allegation
Background
Our client, a working parent with no previous criminal history, faced an allegation of theft from a former employer, a national retailer, involving approximately £4,350.
The matter had been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a charging decision.
Given the potential consequences of criminal proceedings for our client’s employment, financial stability and family, Forest & Co Solicitors was instructed to make pre-charge representations to the CPS before a decision on prosecution was reached.
The Challenge
Our client had accepted responsibility for the alleged conduct and expressed genuine remorse. The central issue was therefore whether prosecution was required in the public interest.
At the time of the alleged offence, our client was experiencing exceptional personal circumstances. Their young child had been diagnosed with a serious, life-threatening medical condition requiring urgent and intensive treatment.
The family was under considerable emotional and financial pressure, and our client had experienced a period of significant personal difficulty while continuing to support the household.
A prosecution and potential criminal conviction risked jeopardising our client’s employment and financial stability, with wider consequences for a vulnerable child requiring ongoing medical care.
A detailed assessment of the circumstances and supporting evidence was therefore essential.
Our Approach
Our team prepared detailed written pre-charge representations addressing the Full Code Test under the Code for Crown Prosecutors, with particular focus on whether prosecution was required in the public interest.
We presented evidence of our client’s lack of previous criminal history, early acceptance of responsibility, genuine remorse and the exceptional circumstances surrounding the alleged offence.
Our client had also entered into an instalment repayment arrangement in respect of the approximately £4,350 owed to the former employer. Regular payments demonstrated a continuing commitment to making restitution and provided practical evidence of our client’s acceptance of responsibility.
Central to our representations was extensive independent medical evidence documenting the child’s diagnosis and treatment.
The records, obtained from specialist NHS centres and the hospital where the initial diagnosis was made, confirmed a diagnosis of retinoblastoma and documented multiple cycles of chemotherapy, repeated examinations under general anaesthetic, further specialist treatment, recurrence of the disease and continuing medical monitoring.
This evidence provided independent support for the exceptional circumstances affecting the family and established a clear timeline between the period of the alleged offence and the acute personal crisis our client was experiencing.
We submitted that the alleged conduct represented an isolated incident arising during exceptional circumstances rather than a pattern of offending. Our client’s subsequent conduct — including maintaining employment, supporting their family and continuing to make regular repayments — further supported our position that the risk of reoffending was low.
Taking these factors together, we invited the CPS to conclude that prosecution would have a disproportionate impact and that the matter could be dealt with appropriately without criminal proceedings.
The Outcome
Following our pre-charge representations, the matter was resolved without prosecution.
Our client was able to avoid the potentially significant consequences of criminal proceedings while continuing to take responsibility for the financial loss through the agreed repayment arrangement.
The outcome also allowed our client to remain in employment, maintain financial stability and continue supporting their young child throughout ongoing medical treatment.
This result demonstrates the importance of presenting detailed and properly evidenced representations to the CPS before a charging decision is made.
Key Takeaway
Pre-charge representations can be an important form of early intervention where a criminal investigation has been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service for a charging decision.
Each case will depend on its individual circumstances. However, where there is relevant mitigation and supporting evidence, carefully prepared representations can ensure that the CPS has a complete picture of the circumstances before deciding whether prosecution is required.
Obtaining legal advice at an early stage can therefore be crucial in ensuring that all relevant evidence is properly presented and that the strongest possible case is advanced before a charging decision is made.
FOREST & CO SOLICITORSNeed advice on a similar matter?
Speak to our team for clear, practical legal advice.
GET IN TOUCH→
Case Study: Successful Pre-Charge Representations in £4,350 Theft Allegation
Background
Our client, a working parent with no previous criminal history, faced an allegation of theft from a former employer, a national retailer, involving approximately £4,350.
The matter had been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a charging decision.
Given the potential consequences of criminal proceedings for our client’s employment, financial stability and family, Forest & Co Solicitors was instructed to make pre-charge representations to the CPS before a decision on prosecution was reached.
The Challenge
Our client had accepted responsibility for the alleged conduct and expressed genuine remorse. The central issue was therefore whether prosecution was required in the public interest.
At the time of the alleged offence, our client was experiencing exceptional personal circumstances. Their young child had been diagnosed with a serious, life-threatening medical condition requiring urgent and intensive treatment.
The family was under considerable emotional and financial pressure, and our client had experienced a period of significant personal difficulty while continuing to support the household.
A prosecution and potential criminal conviction risked jeopardising our client’s employment and financial stability, with wider consequences for a vulnerable child requiring ongoing medical care.
A detailed assessment of the circumstances and supporting evidence was therefore essential.
Our Approach
Our team prepared detailed written pre-charge representations addressing the Full Code Test under the Code for Crown Prosecutors, with particular focus on whether prosecution was required in the public interest.
We presented evidence of our client’s lack of previous criminal history, early acceptance of responsibility, genuine remorse and the exceptional circumstances surrounding the alleged offence.
Our client had also entered into an instalment repayment arrangement in respect of the approximately £4,350 owed to the former employer. Regular payments demonstrated a continuing commitment to making restitution and provided practical evidence of our client’s acceptance of responsibility.
Central to our representations was extensive independent medical evidence documenting the child’s diagnosis and treatment.
The records, obtained from specialist NHS centres and the hospital where the initial diagnosis was made, confirmed a diagnosis of retinoblastoma and documented multiple cycles of chemotherapy, repeated examinations under general anaesthetic, further specialist treatment, recurrence of the disease and continuing medical monitoring.
This evidence provided independent support for the exceptional circumstances affecting the family and established a clear timeline between the period of the alleged offence and the acute personal crisis our client was experiencing.
We submitted that the alleged conduct represented an isolated incident arising during exceptional circumstances rather than a pattern of offending. Our client’s subsequent conduct — including maintaining employment, supporting their family and continuing to make regular repayments — further supported our position that the risk of reoffending was low.
Taking these factors together, we invited the CPS to conclude that prosecution would have a disproportionate impact and that the matter could be dealt with appropriately without criminal proceedings.
The Outcome
Following our pre-charge representations, the matter was resolved without prosecution.
Our client was able to avoid the potentially significant consequences of criminal proceedings while continuing to take responsibility for the financial loss through the agreed repayment arrangement.
The outcome also allowed our client to remain in employment, maintain financial stability and continue supporting their young child throughout ongoing medical treatment.
This result demonstrates the importance of presenting detailed and properly evidenced representations to the CPS before a charging decision is made.
Key Takeaway
Pre-charge representations can be an important form of early intervention where a criminal investigation has been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service for a charging decision.
Each case will depend on its individual circumstances. However, where there is relevant mitigation and supporting evidence, carefully prepared representations can ensure that the CPS has a complete picture of the circumstances before deciding whether prosecution is required.
Obtaining legal advice at an early stage can therefore be crucial in ensuring that all relevant evidence is properly presented and that the strongest possible case is advanced before a charging decision is made.
Need advice on a similar matter?
Speak to our team for clear, practical legal advice.
